What can we learn from research about victims of domestic
abuse in later life and their experiences? To use resources
most efficiently and create effective interventions, it
can be useful to look at the research to learn about existing
commonalities, including gender, among victims. This
paper will examine the research describing common issues
among victims of domestic abuse in later life.
This series of papers
defines domestic abuse in later life as male and female
victims, age 50 and older, abused by someone in a trusted,
ongoing relationship like a spouse/partner, family member,
or caregiver. The victims lived primarily in the community,
not institutions (e.g., nursing homes). Studies from
the United States and Canada were included.
ARTICLES REVIEWED
Thirty articles published between 1988 and 2000 were
reviewed for this article.
| Author(s)
Pub. Date |
Sample
size and demographics |
Type(s)
of abuse covered |
Selected
finding(s)
(page number/s in parentheses) |
| Burgess,
et al
2000 |
20 civil
cases brought by/on behalf of a sexually assaulted
nursing home resident; 2 were under age 55 |
Sexual assault
of a nursing home resident |
·
Eleven of the victimized residents
died within a year of their assault. (16) |
| Dunlop, et
al
2000 |
319 substantiated
cases of abused persons aged 60+ in Miami-Dade Co,
FL |
APS substantiated
cases of abuse, neglect, and exploitation |
·
Nearly one-half of victims (48.5%)
were aged 80+, although this age group comprises
only 18.9% of the population 60+. (106)
·
66.3% of victims were female. (107) |
| Phillips,
et al
2000 |
93 cases
of women aged 55+ caring for dependent spouse or
other elder family member |
Verbal and
physical abuse; being threatened by or having gun
or knife used on them - all by the elder for whom
they were caring. |
·
29% of caregivers reported that they
had been mistreated by the elder; however, 39% answered
positively when asked whether specific abusive behavior
had occurred. "This suggests that for at least
some women, mistreatment was viewed as normal behavior
for the elder and not mistreatment at all.." (139-140)
·
This study did not find that living
in the same household was related to abuse. (139) |
| Teaster,
et al
2000 |
42 substantiated
cases of sexual abuse against persons 60+, collected
over a 3-year period in Virginia |
APS-substantiated
cases of elder sexual abuse |
·
Victims were primarily female (95.2%
of cases). (5)
·
Victims were ages 60 - 69 (7.1%);
70 - 79 (31%); 80 - 89 (47.7%); 90+ (14.2%). (5)
·
Living arrangements: with family
members (16.7%); in adult care residence (2.4%);
in nursing home (80.9%). (5)
·
The majority of victims were unable
to care for or protect themselves. (6) |
| Crichton
et al
1999 |
50 Canadians
age 60+ abused by adult child; 50 abused by spouse
from Elder Abuse Resource Center in Winnipeg |
Agency-substantiated
cases of physical, psychological, and material abuse;
neglect |
·
Of 50 spouse cases, 43 victims were
women, 7 were men. (122)
·
Of abused parents, 40 victims were
mothers, 10 victims were fathers. (122) |
| Lithwick
and Beaulieu
1999 |
128 cases
of mistreatment of adults aged 60+ brought to the
attention of community service agencies in Quebec |
Physical,
sexual or psychological abuse; financial and material
exploitation; neglect |
·
Three-quarters of the victims were
women, 65% of the perpetrators were men. (101)
·
"Almost half of spousal mistreatment
involved cognitive impairment on the part of one
spouse." (102) |
| Sanchez
1999 |
62 individuals
age 60+, Mexican immigrants or Mexican-American,
from community centers in Detroit, MI, and Carson
City, NV |
Physical
abuse, neglect, financial abuse, and denial of shelter |
·
"Victims often justified [violent
elder abuse], claiming they had instigated the violence."
(75) |
| Vladescu,
et al
1999 |
26 abused
elders (age limit unspecified) served between 1/1/97
and 1/1/99 by Seniors' Case Management program in
Hamilton, Ontario |
Physical,
psychological, and financial abuse |
·
84.6% of the victims were female.
(13)
·
57.7% of victims lived with their
abusers; 26.9% lived alone. (13) |
| Anetzberger
1998 |
29 Cleveland
APS cases from 1987 to 1995 |
Psychological
abuse and psychological neglect |
·
Effects of psychological abuse/neglect
included: fear (60%); depression (50%); anxiety
(20%), hopelessness (10%) and denial (10%). (147) |
|
|
Data from
National Crime Victimization Survey for 1992 - 1994,
approximately 50,000 housing units and 101,000 persons
annually |
Robbery
and assault |
·
"Elderly female assault victims were
still more likely than other assault victims to
sustain injuries and require medical care for these
injuries." (195)
·
"Elderly women were more likely to
be assaulted in their homes than in any other location."
(195) |
| NCEA National
Elder Abuse Incidence Study
1998 |
APS reports
and community "sentinel" reports of abused and neglected
persons age 60+ from 20 counties in 15 states in
U.S. |
Physical
abuse, sexual abuse, emotional or psychological
abuse, neglect, abandonment, financial or material
exploitation |
·
People aged 80+ were 19% of the elder
population in 1996, yet made up 51.8% of neglect,
48.0% of exploitation, 43.7% of physical abuse,
and 41.3% of emotional/psychological elder abuse
cases. (6)
·
Women make up 76.3% of emotional/psychological
abuse victims; 71.4% of physical abuse cases; 63.0%
of financial/material exploitation victims, and
60.0% of neglect cases. Men make up 62.2% of abandonment
cases. (6)
·
"Approximately one-half (47.9%) of
the substantiated incidents of elder abuse involved
persons who were not able to care for themselves,
28.7% were somewhat able to do so, and 22.9% were
able to care for themselves." (6)
·
About 60% of victims experienced
some degree of confusion. (6)
·
About 44% of victims were depressed.
(7) |
| Older Women's
Network
1998 |
106 Canadian
women aged 50+ suspected of being victims of domestic
abuse (58% voluntarily disclosed abuse) and 134
stakeholders |
Physical,
emotional, financial and sexual abuse; neglect |
·
Abused older women most often reported
issues of isolation, loneliness, fear, guilt and
shame. (23) |
| Reis and
Nahmiash
1998 |
341 cases
of elders (aged 55+) being cared for by unpaid family
or friends, in Montreal, Canada. Abuse was assessed
as "likely" in 69 cases; "not likely" in 272 cases.
|
Physical,
psycho-social, and financial abuse; both passive
and active neglect |
·
Ranking 27 caregiver and care receiver
characteristics associated with abuse, care receiver
characteristics were:
- Has been abused in the past
- Has marital/family conflict
- Lacks understanding of medical condition
11. Is socially
isolated
15. Lacks social
support
16. Has behavior
problems
- Is financially dependent
- Has unrealistic expectations
- Has alcohol/medication problem
- Has poor current relationship (with caregiver)
- Has suspicious falls/injuries
- Has mental/emotional difficulties
- Is a blamer
- Is emotionally dependent
- No regular doctor (478)
|
| Lachs, et
al 1998 |
2,812 adults
65 and older from a stratified sample of residence
types in CT |
Physical
abuse, neglect and exploitation |
·
After 13 years, survival rates were:
- 9% for those who were abused
- 17% for self-neglecters
- 40% for those not seen by EPS
- 39% for those seen by EPS but whose abuse/neglect
allegations were not verified. (430)
·
"Reported and corroborated elder
mistreatment and self-neglect are associated with
shorter survival after adjusting for other factors
associated with increased mortality in older adults."
(428) |
| Lachs, et
al
1997 (a) |
2,812 adults
65 and older from a stratified sample of residence
types in CT; 47 were substantiated cases |
Physical
abuse, neglect and exploitation |
·
"Several risk factors emerged as
potent predictors of reported elder mistreatment
including poverty, race [non-White], functional
and cognitive impairment, worsening cognitive impairment,
and living with someone." Gender conferred no additional
risk. (Researchers note poverty and race findings
may be due to sample coming from APS.) (473)
·
Elders who suddenly became cognitively
impaired were more at risk for abuse. (473) |
| Lachs, et
al
1997 (b) |
182 victims
of physical abuse aged 60+ from New Haven, CT |
APS-substantiated
cases of physical abuse |
·
76.3% of victims were female. (450)
·
Abusers cohabitated with victims
in 87% of cases. (451) |
| Le
1997 |
20 Vietnamese
age 60+, living with an adult child, at least somewhat
dependent on child, in Southern CA |
Verbal,
emotional, financial and physical abuse |
·
All of the victims were recently
(most <5 years) settled in US. (56)
·
Depression due to abuse and missing
homeland was very common. (60) |
| Reis and
Nahmiash
1997 |
6 groups
from Montreal, Canada were compared: a family caregiver
group (total caregivers 136) and a care receiver
(age 55+) group (total care receivers 128) for confirmed
abuse cases receiving services; confirmed nonabuse
cases receiving services; and confirmed nonabuse
cases not receiving services. |
Physical,
psycho-social, and financial abuse; both passive
and active neglect |
·
Abused care receivers were more unhappy
and reported poorer caregiver/care receiver relationships
than did nonabused care receivers. (347)
·
"Abused care receivers are no more
disagreeable or more neurotic than care receivers
who are not abused." (351) |
| Otiniano
1998 |
24,648 Hispanic
elders referred to the Texas APS system from 1991-1995 |
Cases referred
to APS |
·
Women were twice as likely as men
to suffer abuse of any kind. (194) |
| Seaver
1996 |
132 women
aged 50+ who have attended older abused women's
program in Milwaukee, WI |
Unspecified |
·
No common profile of victims, commonality
was that they live with an abusive mate or family
member. (17)
·
Of 132 women, only 11 have had major
impairments; of these, only 5 were directly dependent
on their abusers for care. (15)
·
These women "have been eager to learn,
use resources well, and respond enthusiastically
to the idea that they deserve more peaceful lives."
(19) |
| Griffin
1994 |
10 abused
African Americans age 60+ and 6 of their perpetrators
from 3 rural counties in North Carolina |
APS-substantiated
cases of financial exploitation (6), self-neglect
(5), verbal abuse (2), and neglect (1) |
·
Victims and perpetrators minimize
and neutralize abusive behavior. (21) |
| Muram, et
al
1992 |
53 female
clients of the Memphis Sexual Assault Resource Center
aged 55-87, matched with 53 female clients aged
18-45 as controls |
Sexual assault |
·
Genital injury was more common and
more serious among older women: 50.9% of older women
were genitally injured compared to 13.2% of the
younger women, and 28% of older women vs. 6% of
younger women required surgical repair. (74)
·
In contrast, "there was no difference
in the prevalence of nongenital injuries between
the two groups." (74)
·
"The majority of assaults involving
elderly women took place in the victim's home by
an assailant who was unknown to the victim. This
is in contrast to younger women for whom the majority
of assaults occurred outside the home" by friends
or acquaintances. (75) |
| Podnieks
1992 (a) |
Random sample
telephone survey of 2008 persons 65+ living in community
settings in Canada |
Physical
and psychological abuse, neglect and financial exploitation
|
·
29% of victims versus 7% of non-victims
said they wished their life would end. (44)
·
Nearly 60% of victims reported their
health was fair or poor, compared to 37% of non-victims.
(45)
·
"Victims of physical violence reported
far less satisfaction with their lives than other
victims." (46)
·
30% of victims of chronic verbal
aggression and 20% of physical abuse victims felt
the abuse was their own fault. (47)
·
"[G]ender is not a risk factor associated
with elder abuse.. This pattern holds for all forms
of maltreatment, with the exception of physical
abuse, in which more men than women were victims."
(42-43) |
| Podnieks
1992 (b) |
42 elder
abuse victims in Canada identified through Podnieks,
1992(a) study |
See Podnieks,
1992(a) |
·
Strong evidence of adaptive strengths
and hardiness of victims. (59)
·
"[I]t is abundantly clear that they
have had a realistic perspective on life and have
been able to cope with "the hand dealt to them"
- even when this meant enduring mistreatment."
(73) |
| Ramsey-Klawsnik
1991 |
28 community-dwelling
older (ages 65 - 101) women suspected by MA APS
workers of being sexually abused |
APS suspicion
elder was sexually abused |
·
All 28 victims were female. (78)
·
46% were in their 70's (78)
·
21% were in their 80's (78)
·
"These women were quite limited in
their capacity to protect and care for themselves."
(78) |
| Greenberg
et al
1990 |
204 cases
of abuse of person 60+ by adult child in WI |
APS-substantiated
cases of physical abuse, material abuse, and neglect |
·
51% of victims were frail. (76)
·
20% of victims were homebound. (76)
·
14% of victims had no health problems.
(76)
·
73% of victims lived with an adult
child, ¾ of them lived in the parent's home. (77)
·
76% of victims were female, 24% male.
(77) |
| Brown
1989 |
Random sample
of 37 Southwest reservation-dwelling Navajo aged
60+, and their family members; 22 cases of elder
abuse found |
Neglect,
verbal/ psychological and physical abuse, and financial
exploitation |
·
The more sudden the elder's dependency,
the more frequent neglect, psychological abuse,
and exploitation. (25)
·
The more the elder perceived as dependent
by family, the more frequent neglect. (26)
·
Elders perceived as depressed and/or
confused were abused most. (27) |
| Godkin, et
al
1989 |
59 abused
elders (60 years and older) compared to 49 non-abused
elders, both served by a Massachusetts home care
program |
Physical,
psychological, and material abuse; active and passive
neglect by a caregiver |
·
"61% of the elderly cases had suffered
a recent decline in mental health prior to their
being abused or neglected; for the comparison group
the figures was 6.4%." (213)
·
"There were no significant differences
between abused/neglected elderly with respect to
the numbers of impairments requiring attention,
nor the numbers of prescribed medications. A significant
percentage of the maltreated elderly was reported
to have experienced a recent decline in physical
health (81.4%) in contrast to about one-fifth (21.3%)
of the non-victimized elders." (213)
·
"Generally, elders who were abused
and neglected had significantly lower cognitive
functioning when compared to the non-abused group
except in the area of remote memory.." (213)
·
"83% of the abused/neglected elderly
reside with their caregivers compared to 42.9% of
those elderly with caregivers who are not abused
or neglected." (219)
·
"Almost 19% of the abused elderly
have no social contacts, whereas only 6.1% of the
controls are without contacts. Over one-third (35.6%)
of this group have suffered recent losses in their
support system, compared to 4.3% in the comparison
group." (219)
·
".it appears that both abused elders
and the abusers experience emotional problems which
contribute to interpersonal difficulties in their
relationship." (223) |
| Pillemer
and Finkelhor
1989 |
Random sample
of 2020 community dwelling people aged 65+ in Boston,
MA; 46 abused elders were reinterviewed and compared
to 215 controls |
Physical
assault; psychological abuse, neglect |
·
"Maltreated elderly did not appear
to be more ill or functionally disabled. The victims
of maltreatment showed only a small, nonsignificant
trend toward greater sickness in the last year,
and scored as no more disabled than other elderly.
Perhaps most important, maltreated elders were no
more dependent on their abusers than were other
elderly on their relatives." (184)
·
This study is consistent with other
research that indicates that abuser characteristics
are a more powerful predictor than victim characteristics.
(186)
·
"In this study, roughly equal numbers
of abused men and women (52% to 48%) were found;
further, the risk of abuse for elderly men is double
that of elderly women (51 per 1000 versus 23 per
1000)." (55) |
| Pillemer
and Finkelhor
1988 |
Random sample
of 2020 community dwelling people aged 65+ in Boston,
Massachusetts; 63 cases of elder abuse found |
Physical
assault, psychological abuse, neglect |
·
Abuse rates were no higher for older
(over 75) than for younger (65-74) elderly. (54)
·
Elders living alone were abused about
one-fourth as often as those living with others;
"those living with a spouse and at least one other
person seemed particularly vulnerable to maltreatment."
(54)
·
Those in poor health were 3 to 4
times as likely to be abused. (54) |
GENERALIZED FINDINGS
No profile of an elder abuse victim emerged from the
data (Seaver, 1996; Pillemer, 1989). Abuser characteristics
are a more powerful predictor than victim characteristics
(Pillemer, 1989).
Information about victims varied greatly depending on
the designated target population of the research. For
example, studies that used adult protective services data
or focused on vulnerable adults naturally found more victims
who were not able to care for themselves or had physical
or cognitive impairments (Teaster, 2000; NEAIS, 1998;
Lachs, 1997a; Ramsey-Klawsnik, 1991; Greenberg, 1990).
Research using older women involved in domestic violence
programming or random sample studies found fewer impairments
(Seaver, 1996; Pillemer and Finklehor, 1989). This pattern
also holds true for age. Some studies found most participants
to be 80 or older (NEAIS, 1998; Dunlop, 2000; Teaster,
2000). However, Pillemer's random sample study found
rate of abuses to be similar for people ages 65 - 74 and
75+ (Pillemer, 1988).
Older female assault victims were more likely to be injured
than were younger assault victims (Bachman, 1998), and
older female sexual assault victims were more likely to
sustain genital injuries (but not other injuries) than
were younger female victims (Muram, 1992).
Most studies found a higher percentage of female victims
than male (Teaster, 2000; Dunlop, 2000; Crichton, 1999;
Lithwick, 1999; Vladescu, 1999; NEAIS, 1998; Lachs, 1997b;
Otiniano, 1998; Ramsey-Klawsnik, 1991; Greenberg, 1990.)
Females accounted for 66 percent - 100 percent of cases
in these studies. Two studies using the Conflict Tactics
Scale found more male victims than female victims of physical
abuse (Podnieks, 1992a; Pillemer, 1988). Unfortunately,
the Conflict Tactics Scale does not differentiate between
levels of physical violence. Throwing something across
the room rates equally to choking a victim. The scale
also does not take into account which party may be living
in fear or have changed their lifestyle as a result of
the abuse (Zorza, 2001). Pillemer acknowledged "only
6% of males abused by wives were injured versus 57% of
women abused by husbands, and the abused women were almost
twice as likely as the abused men to be "very upset" by
the abuse" (Pillemer, 1988).
Several studies noted that high percentages of victims
lived with their abusers (Vladescu, 1999; Lachs, 1997a
and b; Seaver, 1996; Greenberg, 1990; Godkin, 1998; Pillemer,
1988). The abusers were spouses/partner, adult children,
cargivers or other family members. The study that looked
at abused caregivers did not find a correlation
between living with the abuser and abuse (Phillips, 2000).
Depression, a wish to end their lives, unhappiness, shame
or guilt are common among victims (Anetzberger, 1998;
NEAIS, 1998; OWN, 1998; Reis, 1998 and 1997; Le 1997;
Podnieks, 1992a; Pillemer, 1988). Physical and/or cognitive
impairments are also common, although by no means universal
(Teaster, 2000; Lithwick, 1999; NEAIS, 1998; Reis, 1998;
Lachs 1997a; Seaver, 1996; Podnieks, 1992a; Ramsey-Klawsnik,
1991; Greenberg 1990; Godkin, 1989; Pillemer, 1989 and
1988). Whether victims become depressed or impaired
as a result of the abuse or whether depressed or impaired
elders are more susceptible to being abused is unclear.
Lachs (1998) found that abused elders were more likely
to end up dead at the end of a 13-year follow-up period
than self-neglecting or nonabused elders. None of the
deaths were attributed to injuries from the abuse, and
other health issues were controlled for. One speculative
explanation is that negative interpersonal interactions
are related to distress that may increase risk of death.
Although she did not compare her victims to non-abused
nursing home residents, Burgess (2000) similarly noted
that 11 of her 20 victims were dead within a year of being
sexually assaulted. Brown's small study, on the other
hand, noted elders perceived as depressed or confused
where abused most (Brown, 1994).
Victims sometimes see abuse as normal behavior (Phillips,
2000), while others minimize the abuse or believe it is
their fault (Sanchez, 1999; Griffin, 1994; Podnieks, 1992a).
At the same time, some studies identified the strengths
and survival skills of victims (Seaver, 1996; Podnieks,
1992(b)). Podnieks stated there is "strong evidence of
adaptive strengths and hardiness of victims." Seaver
notes: these women "have been eager to learn, use resources
well, and respond enthusiastically to the idea that they
deserve more peaceful lives."
LIMITATIONS OF STUDIES
Numerous limitations in the research on abuse in later
life were found. In part because of the lack of financial
resources, only a few studies have been large (more than
1,000 respondents) random sample studies (Lachs 1997a;
Podnieks, 1992a; Pillemer, 1988). Even these large studies
ultimately based their conclusions on relatively small
numbers of abuse victims, ranging from 47 to 80. Only
one of the random sample studies included cognitively
impaired elders (achieved by interviewing other family
members), but using the reports of proxies is considered
unreliable (The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2001).
All the other studies had serious sampling biases because
they were based on elders who were using services of some
sort and/or were known to adult protective services or
domestic violence programs. This is problematic, because
it is clear that many abused elders are isolated and do
not come to the attention of professionals or seek help.
With one exception (Otiniano, 1998), these studies also
involved relatively small samples - 10 to 401, with the
majority being under 100. Respecting the confidentiality
and safety of victims creates problems with many scientific
methods. Very few studies used control groups.
In addition, some elders deny
that what they are experiencing is abuse (see, for example,
Phillips, 2000), introducing another source of underreporting.
Perhaps more importantly, studies have shown that elders'
definitions of abuse do not always correspond to professionals'
definitions, which may confound findings.
Comparing results across studies is practically impossible.
These studies varied widely in: the types of abuse studied,
the specific definitions of the types of abuse studied;
whether abuse was self-reported or from agency records;
the age of respondents (which ranged all the way down
to 40); whether the target audience was predominately
healthy elders or vulnerable adults; and whether only
women or men and women were included.
POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS
The research did not establish
a clear profile of a victim of domestic abuse in later
life. Older people, particularly women, are vulnerable
both when they are isolated and when they live
with a family member or caregiver.
The research does indicate a
higher percentage of male victims (approximately ¼ - 1/3)
than are seen in the younger domestic violence population.
More research needs to be done to help practitioners identify
male victims and understand their needs. In the meantime,
using gender-neutral language in materials written for
older persons, such as safety planning tools and legal
advocacy, may help professionals reach more victims.
Many victims experience depression,
sadness, isolation, shame, guilt and fear. Effective
services will need to deal with the range of emotions
experienced by elder victims. Focusing intervention strategies
on enhancing the strengths and survival skills of victims
may also prove to be successful.
Authors
Bonnie Brandl, M.S.W.
Project Coordinator
National Clearinghouse on Abuse in Later Life/WI Coalition
Against Domestic Violence
(608) 255-0539
bonnieb@wcadv.org
Loree Cook-Daniels
Consultant
National Center on Elder Abuse
(202) 898-2586
Loree@WordBridges.net
September 2002
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
Sargent, M. and Mears, J. (2000). Older Women Speak
Up: Violence in the Home. Publisher: University
of Western Sydney.
Zorza, J. (2001) The Problem with Proxy Measures: The
Inaccuracy of the Conflict Tactic Scales and Other Crime
Surveys in Measuring Intimate Partner Violence. Domestic
Violence Report, Aug/Sept, 83 - 90. [CANE File No.
Z4901]*
For a list of research questions on elder abuse and domestic
abuse in later life, go to http://www.elderabusecenter.org/research/agenda.html.
For other articles in this series, see:
·
Abusers
www.WordBridges.net/ElderAbuse/Research/2002-09-03R.html
(html) or
www.WordBridges.net/ElderAbuse/Research/2002-09-03R.pdf
(Adobe Acrobat format)
·
Causation theories
www.WordBridges.net/ElderAbuse/Research/2002-09-04R.html
(html) or
www.WordBridges.net/ElderAbuse/Research/2002-09-04R.pdf
(Adobe Acrobat format)
·
Culture
www.WordBridges.net/ElderAbuse/Research/2002-09-05R.html
(html) or
www.WordBridges.net/ElderAbuse/Research/2002-09-05R.pdf
(Adobe Acrobat format)
·
Prevalence and incidence
www.WordBridges.net/ElderAbuse/Research/2002-09-06R.html
(html) or
www.WordBridges.net/ElderAbuse/Research/2002-09-06R.pdf
(Adobe Acrobat format)
·
Relationships
www.WordBridges.net/ElderAbuse/Research/2002-09-07R.html
(html) or
www.WordBridges.net/ElderAbuse/Research/2002-09-07R.pdf
(Adobe Acrobat format)
·
Services and interventions
www.WordBridges.net/ElderAbuse/Research/2002-09-08R.html
(html) or
www.WordBridges.net/ElderAbuse/Research/2002-09-08R.pdf
(Adobe Acrobat format)
·
Types of abuse (includes
sexual assault and homicide/suicide)
www.WordBridges.net/ElderAbuse/Research/2002-09-09R.html
(html) or
www.WordBridges.net/ElderAbuse/Research/2002-09-09R.pdf
(Adobe Acrobat format)
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Anetzberger, G. (1998). Psychological Abuse and Neglect:
A Cross-Cultural Concern to Older Americans. Understanding
and Combating Elder Abuse in Minority Communities,
Archstone Foundation, 141-151. [CANE File No. N4692-17]*
Bachman, R., Dillaway, H., & Lachs, M.S. (1998).
Violence Against the Elderly: A Comparative Analysis
of Robbery and Assault Across Age and Gender Groups.
Research on Aging, 20(2), 183-198. [CANE File
No. N4801-9]*
Brown, A. (1989). A Survey on Elder Abuse at One Native
American Tribe. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect,
Vol. 1, No. 2, 17 - 37. [CANE File No. G3232-11]*
Crichton, S. et al. (1999). Elder Abuse: Feminist and
Ageist Perspectives. Journal of Elder Abuse &
Neglect, Vol. 10, No. 3/4, 115 - 130. [CANE File
No. K4192-9]*
Dunlop, B. et al. (2000). Elder Abuse: Risk Factors
and Use of Case Data to Improve Policy and Practice.
Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, Vol. 12.
No. 3/4, 95 - 122. [CANE File No. L4425-28]*
Godkin, M., Wolf, R., and Pillemer, K. (1989). A Case-Comparison
Analysis of Elder Abuse and Neglect. International
Journal of Aging and Human Development, 28(3): 207-225.
[CANE File No. E2730-10]*
Greenberg, J., et al. (1990). Dependent Adult Children
& Elder Abuse. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect.
Vol. 2, No. 1/2, 73 - 86. [CANE File No. N4888-8]*
Griffin, L. (1994). Elder Maltreatment Among Rural African-Americans.
Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, Vo. 6, No.
1, 1 - 27. [CANE File No. I3691-14]*
Lachs, M. et al. (1998). The Mortality of Elder Mistreatment.
Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol
280, No. 5, 428 - 432. [CANE File No. J4066-5]*
Lachs, M. et al. (1997a). ED Use by Older Victims of
Family Violence. Annals of Emergency Medicine,
30:4, 448 - 454. [CANE File No. J4406-7]*
Lachs, M. et al. (1997b). Risk Factors for Reported
Elder Abuse and Neglect: A Nine-Year Observational Cohort
Study. The Gerontologist, Vol. 37, No. 4, 469
- 474. [CANE File No. J4068-6]*
Le, Q. (1997). Mistreatment of Vietnamese Elderly by
Their Families in the United States. Journal of Elder
Abuse & Neglect, Vol. 9, No. 2, 51-62. [CANE
File No. J4079-7]*
Lithwick, M. et al. (1999). The Mistreatment of Older
Adults: Perpetrator-Victim Relationships and Interventions.
Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, Vol. 11,
No. 4, 95 - 112. [CANE File No. K4213-10]*
National Center on Elder Abuse. (1998). The National
Elder Abuse Incidence Study; Final Report. Available
at http://www.aoa.gov/abuse/report/default.htm.
[CANE File No. J4071-300]*
Older Women's Network. (1998). Study of Shelter Needs
of Abused Older Women. (Available from the
Older Women's Network at (416) 214-1518 or info@olderwomensnetwork.org.) [CANE
File No. Z4896]*
Otiniano, M. et al. (1998). Hispanic Elder Abuse. Archstone
Foundation Understanding and Combating Elder Abuse
in Minority Communities, 194. [CANE File No. N4696-7]*
Phillips, L. et al. (2000). Abuse of Female Caregivers
by Care Recipients: Another Form of Elder Abuse. Journal
of Elder Abuse & Neglect, Vol. 12, No. 3/4, 123
- 144. [CANE File No. L4431-21]*
Pillemer, K. and D. Finkelhor. (1989). Causes of Elder
Abuse: Caregiver Stress Versus Problem Relatives. American
Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Vol. 59, No. 2, 179-187.
[CANE File No. E2641-9]*
Pillemer, K. and D. Finkelhor. (1988). The Prevalence
of Elder Abuse: A Random Sample Survey. Gerontologist,
Vol. 28, No. 1, 51-57. [CANE File No. C2155-7]*
Podnieks, E. (1992a). National Survey on Abuse of the
Elderly in Canada. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect,
Vol. 4, No.1/2, 5 - 58. [CANE File No. A13-28]*
Podnieks, E. (1992b). Emerging Themes from a Follow-up
Study of Canadian Victims of Elder Abuse. Journal
of Elder Abuse & Neglect. Vol. 4, No. 1/2, 59
- 111. [CANE File No. H3384-27]*
Ramsey-Klawsnik, H. (1991). Elder Sexual Abuse: Preliminary
Findings. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect,
Vol. 3, No. 3, 73-90. [CANE File No. G3215-10]*
Reis, M. and D. Nahmiash. (1998). Validation of the
Indicators of Abuse (IOA) Screen. The Gerontologist,
Vol. 38, No. 4, 471 - 480. [CANE File No. A44-10]*
Reis, M and D. Nahmiash. (1997). Abuse of Seniors:
Personality, Stress, and Other Indicators. Journal
of Mental Health and Aging, Vol. 3, No. 3, 337 - 356.
[CANE File No. K4273-20]*
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (2001). Designing
Effective Survey Methods for Frail Elders: Symposium Proceedings.
[CANE File No. N4889-34]*
Sanchez, Y. (1999). Elder Mistreatment in Mexican American
Communities: The Nevada and Michigan Experiences. Tatara
(ed.), Understanding Elder Abuse in Minority Populations,
67-77. [CANE File No. N4669-8]*
Seaver, C. (1996). Muted Lives: Older Battered Women.
Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect. Vol.
8, No. 2, 3-21. [CANE File No. N4761-10]*
Teaster, P. et al. (2000). Sexual Abuse of Older Adults:
Preliminary Findings of Cases in Virginia. Journal
of Elder Abuse & Neglect. Vol. 12, No. 3/4, 1
- 16. [CANE File No. L4420-16]*
Vladescu, D. et al. (1999). An Evaluation of a Client-Centered
Case Management Program for Elder Abuse. Journal of
Elder Abuse & Neglect, Vol. 11. No. 4, 5-22.
[CANE File No. K4209-10]*
*CANE - The Clearinghouse on Abuse
and Neglect of the Elderly - is the nation's largest computerized
collection of elder abuse resources and materials. Single
copies of articles in its holdings can be ordered from
CANE for $.20 per page. The digits following the hyphen
in the file number indicate how many pages the article
has.
CANE
Department of Consumer Studies
University of Delaware
Newark, DE 19716.