Is There Anti-Male Bias in Domestic Violence Services?
"Yes!" That was the resounding response to two May,
2003, articles in the Cecil Whig, a Cecil County, Maryland
newspaper, that were widely reposted on the Internet.
The paper was covering a controversy that erupted when the County's
Domestic Violence/Rape Crisis Center (DVRCC) staff walked out of
a May 12th Cecil County Family Violence Coordinating Council in
protest of its showing a "skewered, sensationalist" 20/20
news magazine segment on women who assault male partners. DVRCC
staff reportedly also said that given the statistics of how few
men come to them for services, they were concerned the Council had
spent too much time in the past year talking about male victims,
to the detriment of other underserved victims such as elderly victims,
those with disabilities, and those with limited proficiency in English.
The controversy got additional mileage the next week, when the
Second Judicial Court discussed whether the walkout precluded the
judges, at least one of whom was present at the Council meeting,
from associating with DVRCC, since state law precludes judges from
associating with people and agencies suspected of gender bias. The
judges apparently did not reach a conclusion.
Partly as a result of the articles being reposted on several men's
rights websites, the paper received (and published) at least 35
comments on the controversy. Nearly every posting argued that the
DVRCC's action was in keeping with domestic violence agencies' attitudes
nationwide, which, the critics charge, routinely ignore statistics
showing that there are two male domestic violence victims for every
three female victims.
Predictably, some of the comments were vitriolic. Many, however,
told personal stories of male victims of domestic violence being
unable to find assistance, and argued that many domestic violence
surveys, studies, and even programs are structured and presented
in ways that highlight violence against women while playing down
violence against men.
Although DVRCC staff had argued that only 14 men compared to 300
women requested services from them last year, one poster noted that
the DVRCC website itself says, "We do not accept males over
the age of 14," which, in his opinion, "boldly state(s),
do not come here for help, if you are male and over the age of 14."
Several pointed out that for many years, domestic violence against
women was not taken seriously, just as the DVRCC was now dismissing
the scope of violence against men.
At least five men talked about their abuse at the hands of women
(one of which said it was mutual); two of these men reported being
disbelieved, scorned, male-bashed, and even prosecuted as a result
of reporting the abuse. Other men claimed the entire social services
system is biased against men and fathers; one said his petition
to get his non-custodial ex-wife to pay ordered child support came
back three times "changed by the receiving county to show me
as the parent in arrears."
The director of a national hotline for battered men said his clients
report "many, many men throughout the country are getting hung
up on by domestic violence advocates who work at these established
projects. If they are not hung up on they are called abusers and
given the number to the nearest batterers intervention program."
His program found that of over 2000 domestic violence programs in
the US, Puerto Rico, and the Virginia Islands, only seven will shelter
men (see article elsewhere in this AAR, "Two New, Innovative
Services Announced"). Another poster commented on the names
of domestic violence services, asking rhetorically if a woman would
seek help at the House of Bubba or the Men's Law Center, referring
to two Maryland agencies (the House of Ruth and the Women's Law
Center) to which DVRCC refers domestic violence survivors.
Several of the postings made reference to resources and publications
that may be useful to those working with male elder and vulnerable
adult abuse victims. These include:
RELATED LINKS:
"Protest raises questions of gender bias; Domestic
violence staff walks out on video showing abuse of men,"
May 15, 2003, Cecil Whig, www.zwire.com
"Gender bias concerns go before judges; Issue raised
after protest by crisis staff," May 21, 2003, Cecil
Whig, www.zwire.com
For comments on the articles, find the Cecil Whig website
through zwire, then click "HOT TOPICS!" under
News in the lefthand column.
|
|